Based on my chosen specialty, the standardized terminology that I will most likely adopt in my nursing practice is the National American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) terminology set. The reason for this is because it is a highly successful model when it comes to planning patient care. NANDA is also very useful when it comes to making decisions about appropriate interventions. It is a comprehensive standardized nursing terminology set. The TIGER initiative is very important to consider when discussing standardized terminologies in nursing practice because it will furnish all nurses with a set of skills related to informatics, from basic computer skills to advanced-level technology literacy.
Various evidence that clearly supports the need for standardized terminology in nursing practice exists; one such research paper is ‘Evidence for the existing American Nurses Association-recognized standardized nursing terminologies: A systematic review’ (Tastan et al, 2014). This study discusses the increase in number of standardized nursing terminology publications in recent years, with a particular focus on NANDA. These studies enable the understanding of the concepts that underpin these standardized terminologies. This study has found that such study designs enhance the overall efficacy of standardized terminologies and their use in clinical nursing practice, and thus should be continued. With regard to informatics, the results of this scholarly research indicate that standardized nursing terminology sets, including NANDA, can successfully integrate and use electronic health records.
Use your promo and get a custom paper on
"Standardized Terminologies in Nursing Practice".
- Hebda, T., and Calderone. T.L. (2010). ‘What nurse educators need to know about the
TIGER initiative’. Nurse Education, 35 (2). Pp. 56-60. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20173588 - Tastan, Sevinc, et al. (2014). ‘Evidence for the existing American Nurses Association-
recognized standardized nursing terminologies: A systematic review’. International
Journal of Nursing Studies, 51 (8). Pp. 1160-1170. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748913003817
