Nationalism as a Cause Yugoslavian Break up
The former Yugoslavia was diverse, but closely related cultural groups, these groups steered good relationship among with little idea of the real owners of the land. The country was so diverse in terms of culture to the extent that no language of cultural practices could be pointed out as those of the land. Despite the cultural diversity Yugoslavia population enjoyed unity of operation and appreciation of each other. The Yugoslavian population then accommodated each other bearing in mind the fact that no one claimed ownership of the land (Hayden, 1995). Being a country formed out constituent nations, the high level of unity displayed good progress from the population.
The division or break up of this wonderful country started with the simple claim of originality. The western and the Eastern civilization run through the region sending conflict message of originality and ownership to a population which stayed united for long. For a long time, the Yugoslavian population drawn from south jug and the slavija of Slavs lived under closely shared cultures, language and other practices. The environment was positive till the time when the Western and Easter civilization wave introduced the element of originality or nationalism. This became the genesis of break up Yugoslavia a country formed on humble grounds of a close relationship among the constituent nations. At this point, every group realized the difference among the constituent nations raising a thorny question about the real owners of Yugoslavia. A country formed from voluntary constituent nations started dividing the basis of language and cultural differences. Each and every placed demands points out why they are the real owners of a land they shared with no demands. The demands placed some of the constituent nations which claimed high population led to regional division, with some smaller nations even failing to identify themselves with any language. Nationalism in Yugoslavia is the real cause of the break up in Yugoslavia it is widely perceived without the introduction of nationalism Yugoslavia would have remained unity.
Use your promo and get a custom paper on
"Political Anthropology Questions".
How have Cold War policies of the United States vis-a-vis Afghanistan proven problematic in the long run?
US’s Afghanistan inversion proven positive at the initial stages, US succeeded in ensuring that Afghanistan and its support nations did not succeed in using their powers to pull part any unitary states. However, the move was characterized by a series of the cold war policies in terms of governance. US stood for a centralized governance to unite the people after the inversion which killed ethic leadership. However, it was clear that people never recognized any central leadership at the time (Barfield, n.d). This led a negative perception that the central leadership could not cope with the countries regional diversity then. Based on the need to establish stability in Afghanistan, this was a negative perception with problems or impact on the people. It is important to take note of the fact that dissatisfaction with central with centralized leadership on its ability to manage regional diversity, clearly sent messages of inequality to the people thus created a long run struggle to ensure equality within Afghanistan.
The cold war policies in Afghanistan led to a presidential election in2009 termed fraudulent sending another mistrust message to the centralized government. Although the centralized government meant better to the people of Afghanistan, it was better for US and other involved parties to handle the issues of diversity on the ethnic basis. Based on the fact the 2009 presidential election did take into account regional or ethnic diversity, it gave enough room space regional and ethnic ties to take over. This is one dangerous or disadvantageous way to run any republic or nation around the globe. The failure to incorporate all the elements of Afghanistan into the centralized governance made the ethnic networks stronger which will affect the country for durations than perceived.
- Barfield, T (n.d). Afghanistan’s Ethnic Puzzle Decentralizing Power before US Withdrawal
- Hayden, R (1995). Serbian and Croatian Nationalism and the Wars in Yugoslavia Retrieved on 18th December 2013 from, http://www.culturalsurvival.org
