The events of the Arab Spring in 2010 and 2011 were amongst the most profound political movements of the 21st century. They involved mass uprisings in countries across North Africa and the Middle East. Around the region, people in Egypt, Libya and Syria took part in mass demonstrations with the aim of removing undemocratic leaders and replacing them with democratic governments. In this way, many people argued that the Arab Spring was evidence of the fact that people around the world desired freedom and that they would naturally try to bring about democracy. Importantly, when people spoke about the Arab Spring, they understood democracy to be a kind of government similar to that which exists in Europe. This would be a form of government in which people participate in elections and are therefore able to choose their own rulers and have an amount of control over their own lives and the laws that they live by. In this way, to argue that the Arab Spring was a series of movements that aimed to bring about democracy is also to suggest that it represented the attempt by the countries in question to move towards a more western form government. As such, this also leads to the question as to whether or not the failure of the Arab Spring movements to bring about democracy suggests that the countries themselves were not ready for democracy.
On the one hand, it is does not appear to be fair to say that the failure of the movements in question to bring about democracy should be seen to show that the countries themselves are not ready for democracy. One of the most important aspects about the Arab Spring was that it was involved a very significant amount of young people, rather than simply the older members of society. Several people commented that the fact that young people played such large role was very positive for the future of the countries involved. On a basic level, the fact that the movements were mainly young people suggests that the future of these countries will be guided by people who believe in democracy and who are willing to fight and to risk their lives in order to bring it about. In this way, it is possible to argue that the people who participated in the movement are likely to participate in more movements in the future. It is also possible to argue that the same people are likely to pass on their experience in the Arab Spring to their children and to other even younger people in society. It is likely, therefore, that at one point in the future the vast majority of people in the countries in question will either have taken part in movements themselves, or will know someone who has.
Use your promo and get a custom paper on
"Is Arab World Ready For Democracy After The Arab Spring?".
As well as this, the fact that the movements were led by young people also shows the way in which young people have access to ideas and media from outside of the country in which they live. The internet played a very important role in the Arab Spring in general, and it helped people to organize their political actions, as well as helping them to make to communicate their ideas, and to help them to communicate with people around the world. This ability to share their ideas was an important part of the way that the movement developed. This fact also shows that it is likely that movements like the Arab Spring could occur again, as young people in the countries in question will continue to be in touch with people around the world, meaning that ideas related to democracy and freedom will continue to be shared within the countries.
In contrast to this, however, it is also possible to argue that the effects of the Arab Spring may suggest that the countries concerned are not ready for democracy. This seems to be especially the case when one looks at places such as Egypt, Libya and Syria, all of which are now arguably worse places than they were before the Arab Spring. In particular, Libya and Syria are currently involved in serious power struggles, and it is unlikely that these will result in democracy. Importantly, while this does not suggest that the people themselves may not be ready for democracy, it does suggest that the regions may not be able to support it at the moment. In this way, the events of the Arab may suggest, more than anything, that democracy is only possible when the desire of people for democracy is combined with a situation in which it can actually take place.
In conclusion, therefore, the Arab Spring is a deeply important event for those who are interested in the spread of democracy and freedom around the world. On the one hand, it appears as if the mass movements and the interest of young people provide clear evidence that the countries in question are ready for a democratic kind of government. On the other hand, however, it could also be argued that the attempt to bring about democracy in these countries has failed and that this shows the countries were not ready. Ultimately, however, it may simply be the case that the example of the Arab Spring shows that while the countries might be ready for democracy in terms the people’s understanding of it, they may not be ready in terms of their ability to actually make it real. The lesson of the Arab may finally be
