A presented court case and the respective decision clearly imply the extent of sensitivity to the race and age discrimination at a workplace in the United States. A supportive court ruling in favour of Mr. Humphries is evidence that the judicial system in the United States still stands against race and age-discrimination quite strongly.
It is quite likely that the court decision was positive due to the historical sensitivities experienced in the country. As the United State experienced the Civil War, a topic of race and age discrimination is specifically relevant. That is why when Mr. Humphries reported the discrimination; the actions were undertaken immediately by the judicial system. Moreover, given that there was a previous precedent in the Sullivan v. Lille Hunting Park in 1969, the court ruling was particularly strict and intolerant to the exposed discrimination.
Use your promo and get a custom paper on
"Race and Age-Based Discrimination".
Besides that, the court decision raises another important issue such as employment protection. In particular, the fact that Mr. Humphries could take his claim to trial provides additional grounds in support of the employees experiencing discrimination at work. Most probably, there are plenty more cases like the one described in the United States, and the Court opinion could serve as an example to those employees who experience fear and may be afraid to bring their cases to the court. As the court decision received much of the media attention, it is another indication that the court ruling was quite resonant and particularly relevant.
Personally, I approve the actions of Mr. Humphries and strongly believe that no employee should experience discrimination based on their race, age or the sexual orientation. The more the judicial system in the United States asserts this through the court cases, the more effect and outcomes favoring employee protection there will be in the United States.
- “Humphries Case.” Robinson Curley P.C., 2018, https://www.robinsoncurley.com
