Disseminating information can be incredibly beneficial in multiple disciplines. Within the field of medicine, providing findings of patient cases can allow other medical professionals to make informed treatment decisions and improve the wellbeing of their patients. It can also reduce redundancies within standard offices. In the field criminal investigations, the spreading and sharing of findings can give other investigators keys to solving their open cases. Businesses can benefit by improving operational productivity. Researchers can lend credence to their findings by providing others with the tools to recreate and support their findings while also giving the field a new, notable contribution.
Following an investigation in causes of disease in the medical field, disseminating the findings can aid others in preventative care or treatment. If symptoms are present in multiple cases across the states, and an autopsy for one patient contains results that can be directly applied to saving the other patients who are still living, disseminating those results is the only manner by which the investigation can be beneficial (Grimshaw, et. al., 2004). Keeping the investigatory results hidden or secret places increased burdens on others in the healthcare industry to solve the problem on their own. This limits the potential for growth across the board. Within a single medical office, the dissemination of information can help to prevent repetition; knowing when doses were administered last or what paperwork has been collected from patients can alleviate the risk of accidentally administering double doses or asking for paperwork that is already on file. This saves time and effort on behalf of the facility, while also protecting the health and wellbeing of patients (Brownson, 2012).
Use your promo and get a custom paper on
"Benefits of Dissemination".
Following a criminal investigation, disseminating the findings can aid other investigators that are currently pending. Those who are searching for the culprit to a crime might be aided by reviewing the findings of another open or closed investigation. This is particularly useful for serial killers who often escape local jurisdiction and continue to commit crimes in other districts. If a trail can be established, with clues gleaned from the disseminated findings of other reports, then criminals can be better tracked and caught. Between different investigatory bodies the dissemination of investigatory findings can lead to better national defenses. The collaborative efforts by local police forces to produce CCTV tapes in conjunction with transportation officials stopping passengers to verify identification can allow larger investigatory bodies to track down criminals on the run. Disseminating the findings of an investigation into recently developed Al Qaeda training camps in Yemen to regulatory bodies in the European Union can enable legislative bodies to place new restrictions on travel by those who return to the European Union from Yemen. Such dissemination is tantamount to inter-office collaboration that can improve national defenses and put a halt to potential attacks that are otherwise increasing throughout Europe (Ronczkowski, 2004, p. 3).
Following a business investigation, disseminating the findings of a company analysis can offer a decisive means by which the company can improve their actions. Quarterly findings, management reviews, or investigations into particular aspects of the company operations including the supply chain management, customer satisfaction, or the use of technology can all offer a path on which the company can set out to make improvements. This would enable increased efficiency and overall profit. Reviewing the findings of a competing company, the results of which are disseminated throughout the corporate structure, can encourage all available minds to work together to gain a competitive advantage by implementing new policies, new software, or upgrading existing systems. Businesses who need to cut losses or restructure their employment can work cohesively to improve profitability and productivity by disseminating the results of their investigations into the various internal forces within the company (Ettredge, 2002).
As a researcher, the dissemination of investigations can enable others to recreate lab findings, research methods, and to lend credibility to the authenticity of a single report. Disseminating the findings of an investigation into current methodology or theories can create stepping stones imperative to the overall growth of academia (Tabakm, 2012).
Overall, each field benefits from dissemination of investigations in a unique fashion. In the medical field, improved dissemination of findings can lead to more open communication and better patient care. Within criminal investigations, improved dissemination of findings can lead to the apprehension of criminals at a faster rate. It can reduce the risk of terrorist attacks by improving national security. For businesses, productivity and profit can increase. Researchers can improve the legitimacy of their findings by enabling other researchers to recreate their results and to expound upon them. No matter the field, disseminating the results of investigations is beneficial for all involved.
- Brownson, R. (2012). Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ettredge, M., Richardson, V., & Scholz, S. (2002). Dissemination of information for investors at corporate Web sites. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 357-369.
- Grimshaw, J., Thomas, R., Maclennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C., Vale, L., … Donaldson, C. (2004). Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
- Ronczkowski, M. (2004). Terrorism and organized hate crime: Intelligence gathering, analysis, and investigations. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press.
- Tabak, R., Khoong, E., Chambers, D., & Brownson, R. (2012). Bridging Research and Practice: Models for Dissemination and Implementation Research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(3), 337-359.
