Topic: Euthanasia should not be legalized in the society
General Purpose: To argue
Specific Purpose: To argue that the American Medical Association should not allow Euthanasia to be used to end lives.
Central Idea/Thesis Statement: Even though many people think that euthanasia should be used as an option to end suffering among the suffering patients, the practice should not be accepted in the society because various moral and ethical questions in relation to different religious beliefs that have been raised, various religious books such as the Bible opposes it, it is against the religious doctrines that do not kill, and it is only God who can give and also take away life.
Use your promo and get a custom paper on
"Speech Outline Against Euthanasia".
Introduction
According to Earli (2004), many countries in the present world such as Netherlands and Belgium, physicians and doctors practice physician assisted suicide better known Euthanasia.
Oregon became the first US state to make Euthanasia legal. The law came into effect in 1997 and enables the terminally ill, and mentally competent patients with a few months to live to request for a life ending medication. In 2013, a similar law was passed by Vermont legislature. Moreover, court decisions made the Euthanasia practice legal in New Mexico and Montana.
While such laws have been passed in such states, there has been major call against the passing of such laws especially from the religious society such as Christians.
The medical community as well is also divided in regard to legalizing euthanasia in the society.
The research paper is against euthanasia.
Body
Definition: euthanasia is the act using medical prescription to end the life of someone in a painless especially if the individual is has been suffering from an illness that incurable. The doctors provides a lethal injection to the patient and the patient falls slowly into a sleep and then passes away. From a passive perspective, the doctor denies the patient any more medications that may help them to live longer.
First, there are various moral and ethical questions in relation to different religious beliefs that have been raised in regard to euthanasia.
The issue of sacredness of human life is brought into question. Human life is considered to be sacred and should not be ended by anyone else, an aspect that is common across various organizations.
Hippocratic Oath which is a common practice in the medical field.
Responsibility of life deprivation.
Physicians who support the use of euthanasia should understand the Bible opposes it.
According to Genesis 1: 27, “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” This implies that God created man in his own image and He is the only who is responsible in ending the life of a human being regardless of the magnitude of suffering.
Physicians against euthanasia understand the God created man in his own image and they should not dare to violate God’s image or even try to deface God himself.
The Ten Commandments provided by God and contained in the Bible take into account the issue of death and euthanasia can be considered as murder and violating the commandment that says, though shall not kill.
Killing or ending someone’s life can constitute murder before God.
People against euthanasia realize that the religious doctrines and teachings oppose any form of mercy killing.
Euthanasia violates the trust of patients on the doctors. Trust is common among religious groups and it is embraced for positive living in the society especially in the health care sector.
Lack of trust between patients and doctors if euthanasia laws are fully enacted. Religious leaders argue that trust between doctors and patients will be affected.
Patient would consider the practice as a last hopelessness action to save their lives and yet religious groups consider that people should put their hope in God.
People against euthanasia argue that it is only God who can give and also take away life.
Many religions believe that life is sacred and there is not individual who is entitled to purposely end someone’s life.
The bill of rights also provides everyone an equal chance of life regardless of their socioeconomic, religious, or cultural background.
Religious teachings argue that people should respect each other in the society and should show love to their neighbors.
Even though euthanasia is considered morally and ethically unacceptable in the society by various religious groups and denomination, it can become a means of containing health costs.
There has been increased emphasis in place to control escalating health care costs.
Many people in the US have no medical insurance especially the minorities groups and the poor.
Relieves families off financial risks.
It can also save significant costs for the government.
Some religious people do support voluntary euthanasia.
The Catholic or the Dutch Reformed clergymen in the Netherlands sometimes may be present in assisted euthanasia.
Religious arguments should not be applied to anyone who does not share the belief.
Conclusion
In a nutshell, even though many people think that Euthanasia should be used as an option to end suffering among the suffering patients, the practice should not be accepted in the society because of:
Various moral and ethical questions in relation to different religious beliefs that have been raised
Various religious books such as the Bible opposes it
It is against the religious doctrines that do not kill
It is only God who can give and also take away life
Euthanasia should be allowed in the society because it goes against the religious teachings and human right to live.
- Barnard, C. (1989). “Doctors Should Decide.” Euthanasia. Ser. Eds. David Bender, and Bruno Leone. Ed. Neal Bemards. Opposing View Points Ser. San Diego, CA: Greehaven,. 155-166.
- Bender, D. & Bruno, L. (1989). Eds. Euthanasia. Ed. Neal Bernards. Opposing View Points Ser. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven.
- Bohlin, R. (2004). “Euthanasia: “The Battle for Life Physician-Assisted Suicide.” Probe.org. 2004. Probe Ministries. Retrieved 4 April 2015 from http://www.probe.org/docs/euthanas.html
- Dotts, K. (2004). “Euthanasia.” Ed. Kenny Wyatt. Tennessee Right to Life. 1999-2001. Tennessee Right to Life. Retrieved 4 April, 2014 from http://www.tennesseerightto1ife.org/human_life_issues/ human_lifejssueseuthanasia.htm
- Earli, C. (2004). “Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia.” Focus on the Family. Retrieved 4 April 2015 from http://www.family.org/cforumIfosi/bioethics/euthanasia1 a0027997.cfm
