Introduction
The correlation between the actualization of human rights and the conservation of the natural systems and biodiversity is a pertinent issue, which raises divergent viewpoints and theoretical suppositions from scholars around the globe. The conservation of the natural systems and biodiversity is axiomatic as it invigorates the actualization of social, economic and cultural rights which include appropriates standards of living, the rights to health, cultural freedom and freedom from hunger. The exclusionary approaches to the conversation might lead undermining of the above rights, which might pose prostate impediments to the realization of the conservation rights. Therein, the rights of biodiversity should not take precedence over the rights of human communities in the conservations as the quality and livelihood of human life has an ethical claim against the utmost primacy of the ecological integrity.
Use your promo and get a custom paper on
"Biodiversity Protection".
Argumentations
In the recent years, there is increased research and extrapolations in the interconnectedness between the conservation of biodiversity and the institutionalization of frameworks that vindicate human rights by assessing the recent extensionist and biocentric approaches to environmental ethics. An example is the in-situ approaches and stratagems utilized in Kenya by the Kenya Wildlife Services or conjointly with the adjacent communities to protect national parks, wildlife, and sanctuaries. The above precedent outlines the preeminence of eclectically comprehending and addressing the essence of biodiversity conservation and the protection of human rights. There is a close and intricate interrelationship between conservation of biodiversity and the actualization of the inherent human rights as they are conjoined and are both basal ethical values.
The Brandberg Nature Reserve in Namibia is an example of a conservation biodiversity site that highlights the shifting policies practices in the conservation techniques that are more effectual, efficient and subsumes the aspect of equitability in both the process of conservation and outcomes of conservation protection. The predominant aim of the reserve is to create awareness, which incentivizes, encourages and assistance to the adjacent communities to conserve the diversity and the integrity of the natural system by ensuring the utilization of the natural resources subsumes the aspects of equitability and ecological sustainability. Hence, the above factors outline the interrelationship between biodiversity protection and the rights of the human communities.
The Lake Manyara National Park and Ngorongoro Crater are biodiversity sites in Tanzania, which outlines that the conservation of biodiversity should not take precedence over the rights of human beings who have an ethical claim to the utilization of the natural resources in the conservation sites. The approaches utilized in the protection of biodiversity in Tanzania underpins that the rights-based approaches are salient in abetting the rights and the responsibilities of the communities involved in the conservation of biodiversity rather than practicing exclusionary approaches to the conservation of biodiversity. The approaches buttress that human sustenance is a central point in the conservation biodiversity and the approaches should utilize in the conservation should support the duty bearers and the right holders in ensuring the actualization of the biodiversity conservation goals. Therein, the above argumentation outlines that the rights of biodiversity should not take precedence over the rights of human communities in the conservations.
Counter Argument
The arguments for the conservation of biodiversity encompasses aesthetic and strong ethical aspects, which are superficially cogent, but they largely depend on changeable social and economic circumstances. Some people could disagree with the above argumentations as they expedite that biodiversity has a cogent value in itself and it is fundamental to the efficient ecologically functioning of the planetary environmental system.
Conclusion
The rights of biodiversity should not take precedence over the rights of human communities in the conservations as the quality and livelihood of human life has an ethical claim against the utmost primacy of the ecological integrity. The conservation policies and approaches utilized in Kenya, Tanzania, and Namibia abet the rights and the responsibilities of the communities’ involvement in the conservation of biodiversity rather than practicing exclusionary approaches to the conservation of biodiversity.
- Caro, Tim, & Davenport, T. (2016). Wildlife and wildlife management in Tanzania. Conservation Biology, 30(4), 716-723.
- Kioko. (2016). ). Influence of light pollution and biodiversity awareness on hawkmoth (lepidoptera: sphingidae) diversity and abundance in selected sites in Kenya.
- Schusser. (2013). Who determines biodiversity? An analysis of actors’ power and interests in community forestry in Namibia. Forest Policy and Economics, 42-51.
